The Australian Seven Network, owned by Kerry Stokes, has increased its stake in The West Australian Newspaper to 22.3%, with a buy up of 4 million shares today.
The buy up follows a failed attempt to divide the present WAN board and win Stokes a seat in April. The implications of the move on the media barren west coast seem clear enough for anyone interested in media diversity.
Also clear is the way it brings into sharp focus the cross media ownership restrictions that the Howard government was able to abolish that made Stokes' expansion possible. We need the Rudd Government to finally take the chronic state of Australian media seriously. But it seems for now, it suits their purpose of quietening dissent...
Showing posts with label channel seven. Show all posts
Showing posts with label channel seven. Show all posts
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Monday, July 21, 2008
What coverage can we expect in Beijing?
What games are the world going to see? That is the biggest question on the minds of millions across the globe in the lead-up to the Olympic Games in Beijing. As the New York Times' Brian Stelter explains in "Networks Fight Shorter Olympic Leash", this is a question that is still yet to be answered.
NBC, who has paid a record amount for the rights and expects to rake in $1 billion in advertising is set to find itself in a compromised position, when, not if, protest actions take place during the upcoming games. NBC, is owned by General Electric, a company that is continuing to deepen its investments in China. NBC has already started censuring its own journalists, in order to halt questioning over what is expected of them in Beijing.
China has been slow moving in handing out any rights to media companies. They are worried about the Tibet protesters that plagued their torch relay as well as China's underclasses which have been hit hard by the authoritarian capitalist regime. What we all want to know is whether the media will report or not report what is going on outside the stadiums and if so, whom will do the reporting? Will those that have the most to lose (like NBC) hold back and be upstaged by lesser known media outlets? Who will make the gains and who will fall by the wayside?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/21/sports/olympics/21nbc.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=todayspaper
Stay Tuned...
Update 24/07/08: Chinese Authorities have declared special legalised "protest areas", that may be used for approved protest actions during the upcoming games. Similar measures have been enforced at most past games, so we'll have to wait and see how it is enforced. The IOC and Chinese authorities have been quick to point out that this allowance does not permit violations of the Olympic Charter, which forbids "political, religious or racial propaganda... in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas". More @ Huffington Post
NBC, who has paid a record amount for the rights and expects to rake in $1 billion in advertising is set to find itself in a compromised position, when, not if, protest actions take place during the upcoming games. NBC, is owned by General Electric, a company that is continuing to deepen its investments in China. NBC has already started censuring its own journalists, in order to halt questioning over what is expected of them in Beijing.
China has been slow moving in handing out any rights to media companies. They are worried about the Tibet protesters that plagued their torch relay as well as China's underclasses which have been hit hard by the authoritarian capitalist regime. What we all want to know is whether the media will report or not report what is going on outside the stadiums and if so, whom will do the reporting? Will those that have the most to lose (like NBC) hold back and be upstaged by lesser known media outlets? Who will make the gains and who will fall by the wayside?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/21/sports/olympics/21nbc.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=todayspaper
Stay Tuned...
Update 24/07/08: Chinese Authorities have declared special legalised "protest areas", that may be used for approved protest actions during the upcoming games. Similar measures have been enforced at most past games, so we'll have to wait and see how it is enforced. The IOC and Chinese authorities have been quick to point out that this allowance does not permit violations of the Olympic Charter, which forbids "political, religious or racial propaganda... in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas". More @ Huffington Post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
